What the American revolutionaries did and what the founders of the State of Israel did meets the current definition of terrorism from the FBI web site, but that cannot be. That's why Scragged offers a subtle, but vital, change to the official definition.

We're acting like King George and not like George Washington.

There are two ways to interpret the law: a) favor individual rights over societal rights or b) favor society's rights over the rights of the individual. Individuals won two!

Why is terrorism so prevalent there? And how well is it working?

There is no doubt that many actions by the Minutemen, the people whose harassment of soldiers triggered the Boston Massacre, and the people who burned the Gaspee, were against the law.

Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute.

Terrorism is an act of weakness, not an act of strength. It's what you do when nothing else will work for you.

Poverty causes terrorism? Not so much...

There's a good reason for tyrants to want it to be extremely difficult for anyone to get a car.

A car dealer makes a mint from Obama's gaffes.