Politics

Blame the victim? Blame whitey? Or roll up your sleeves and get to work?

Two wrongs aren't nearly enough to add up to a Rev. Wright.

It seems pretty clear that McCain expects to reach the Oval Office without the Republican base.

Barack and Hillary shoot each other in the feet.

They told us how they cooked the books. What have they been doing the rest of the time?

It is far, far better to have a sane Democratic party.

No longer do we seem to be a country of united states, but rather a country of individuals living in different states with less sovereignty each time a new bill is passed.

If a politician is listening to a "special interest group," and is doing what they request, does that mean that he's their "captive"? Or, rather, does it mean that he is performing his Constitutional duty of listening to the grievances of a group of his constituents and representing their interests?

Republicans, and more particularly conservatives, must rely on more than a hatred of Hillary Clinton to advance their cause.

Almost a full century ago, a few cancer cells were introduced into our body politic.

Thanks to the superdelegates, Barack Obama could win the popular electoral vote fair and square, and still lose at the convention.

In fact, we encourage them to vote even though we know most of them will make the wrong decision.

Yesterday would have been Reagan's 97th birthday; and so we ask, does anyone wear Reagan's mantle today?

It almost doesn't matter what the topic is, the argument may already be lost. We've already established there is little national virtue left. We're now just talking about the price.

The most important question is this: will the GOP focus on growing itself by continuing to move to the left or will it redefine itself by the views of its base? Will it embrace centrists or be content with losing the next few elections?