Cain and the Media Kiss of Life

For conservatives, media feeding frenzies now do more good than harm.

Thus far, the Republican primary campaign has been a strange sequence of trips and blunders.  It seemed like Mitt Romney would be "next in line" until conservatives and Tea Partiers revolted.  Then it looked as if Texas Gov. Rick Perry would be the True Conservative standard-bearer, until America discovered that his debate performances make George W. Bush look like Ronald Reagan in the eloquence department.

Soon the flavor of the day appeared to be that most successful businessman Herman Cain.  He has no political experience, but as he pithily pointed out regarding our usual habit of electing career politicians, "How's that working out for you?"

Having elected an inexperienced career politician is not working out well at all.  With unemployment as it is, the thought of electing a man who has in fact personally put many thousands of people into profitable work has great appeal.  While race shouldn't matter a whit, we all know it does; the Democrats can call the black Mr. Cain a racist all they please, but they'll have a hard time making it stick to him.

Another High-Tech Liberal Lynching

No, some other way had to be found to take down this potential potent conservative.  In their desperation, the left reached back to some decade-old incidents.

Apparently, way back in the mid-1990s, a woman or two (or three?) accused Herman Cain of sexual harassment.  The cases were settled cheaply, confidentiality agreements signed, and the whole thing forgotten even by the lawyers involved - until Politico decided to publish more than 90 stories about it.

What's bizarre is the total lack of anything verifiable.  What was in the settlement or underlying investigation?  We don't know; it's all covered under confidentiality agreements and the lawyer involved doesn't even have a copy anymore.

Were there any witnesses to anything overt and demonstrably criminal?  Not that anyone's ever mentioned.

Who even are these women?  Well, one of them has come forward - only to describe a relatively minor (though crude and inappropriate) incident to which there were no witnesses.  All this from many years gone by!

We're previously written how the justice system is totally incapable of determining the truth of incidents like this.  Predictably, though, the left-wing media rushed in where the cops knew better than to tread, declaring MR. Cain manifestly unfit for public office or polite company.


Mr. Cain's poll ratings rose.

How to Know a True Conservative

The scribes of America may be scratching their heads as to why their best efforts at character assassination brought Mr. Cain's candidacy the kiss of awakening, but over in England they've figured it out:

Despite the maelstrom, Cain’s accusers remain anonymous and the details of the allegations oddly vague. With many conservatives believing that sexual harassment lawsuits are an industry and that frivolous cases are often settled to avoid more expensive litigation, there was a growing sense that Cain was being treated unfairly...

With the case against him thin and the accusation so incendiary, Cain’s predicament is prompting more sympathy than opprobrium[emphasis added]

You see, the mainstream media may have persuaded large chunks of their audience that Mr. Cain's character is questionable, but how many MSM readers vote in Republican primaries?  For sure, next to none of the journalists themselves do.

Mr. Cain doesn't have to worry about persuading all of America to like him; that's a problem for another day.  For right now, all he has to do is convince core Republican grassroots folks, the kind who actually turn up on primary day in a New Hampshire snowstorm or to those oddball caucuses in West Cornfield, Iowa, that he's their man.

What better way could there be to prove his conservative credentials than by being so venomously hated by the same liberal media that, as Republican core voters devoutly believe, hates them, their way of life, and all they hold dear from guns to religion to giving birth instead of having abortions?

Winston Churchill once said, "If Hitler invaded hell I would make at least a favorable reference to the devil in the House of Commons."  Mr. Cain may or may not be the Devil, but the conservative's Hitler in the form of the mainstream media has definitely declared war on him.  If he's got them that upset, hey, he must be a pretty decent fellow!

No, it's not Herman Cain that needs to be worried about the media frenzy; it's Mitt Romney.  The more the media talks Mr. Romney up, the more Republican primary voters will spew him out in disgust.

The lesson for would-be Republican candidates is this: favorable treatment by the media is the kiss of death; media attacks are the kiss of life with primary voters.  Anyone loved by the media stands revealed for all the world to see as a phony and a closet liberal; anyone hated by the media has a decent chance of being Our Guy.

Petrarch is a contributing editor for Scragged.  Read other articles by Petrarch or other articles on Partisanship.
Reader Comments

Well said.

However, I think it's Huntsman that got the real media kiss of death when the NYT declared that he would have the best odds against Obama.

Sorry, Huntsman. You seem like a nice guy; horrible what the NYT did to you.

November 10, 2011 8:57 AM

>that most successful businessman Herman Cain.

Not so sure about that.
Herman Cain's Enron-esque Disaster

November 10, 2011 12:02 PM

I like Cain and don't believe any of the stories surrounding him. I ran restaurants back in the 90's and often saw women trying to trump up possible "abusive" charges against the managers because they wanted to stay home and get paid for it. The managers I saw that were most targeted were the easy-going ones who went out of their way for their crew members and showed they cared. Those managers were thought to be easy-marks, too gentle to fight back strongly. I don't know anything about other industries but I DO know the food industry well and what goes on in it. That's why I don't believe any of these stories about Cain.

November 10, 2011 3:15 PM


Huntsman deserved it! The NYT is simply telegraphing the name of the person they hope the Republicans nominate. They understood that if the GOP nominated another Democrat-Lite, everyone who isn't a diehard leftist will stay home in despair -- which is one explanation for 2008. This is the closest they'll get to admitting that if the GOP nominates an actual, honest-to-God libertarian or conservative that the democrat parties are toast.

November 10, 2011 5:21 PM

This is a for what it's worth department: I was listening to Neal Boortz this morning and he was talking about a voice recognition device that could decipher whether or not someone is telling the truth. This device is suppose to be much more accurate than a lie detector test and has been proven so in blind trials. A man who is an expert in this field taped the voice of Bialik and Cain's response to her. The expert said there was little doubt that she was lying and that Cain was absolutely telling the truth. Once this gets out I'm sure the LSM will be slamming this device as a voodoo conspiracy. What is really more troubling for Cain is not these bimbos but his performance as compared to Newt's last Saturday night at the Woodlands. Newt and Cain had a discussion of the issues, not a debate, which was fortunate for Cain. Cain acknowledges that Newt has a better grasp on issues than he does but it still makes you wonder what Newt could do for our country. His common sense solutions, his ability to communicate to Joe Six Pack and his intellect are staggering. Perhaps Cain could shoot for the VP. Please don't bring up Rubio, he's too young and besides, if he wants to run for the presidency later on he does not need to be tied to anyone else, he can do it on his own, he is that talented. Just an observation.

November 10, 2011 6:22 PM
Add Your Comment...
4000 characters remaining
Loading question...