Don't Just Say No; VOTE NO!

By Hobbes
Published: February 1, 2008, 08:16 PM

The Democrats took over the House and Senate a year ago.  Pelosi promised to clean up Congress, but funny things happened.  Pelosi's Democrats threw out a law that would have required that they list lawmaker's names when a lawmaker spent money on a pet project.  When they steal our money, they don't want us to know which of them stole it.  They threw out a law that would make it illegal to send money to businesses that hire lawmaker's relatives.  When they steal our money, they want to split the swag with their families.  The only thing Democrats didn't like about Republican corruption was that they weren't in on it.  Now that they can send earmarks to their friends in return for bribes, sorry, campaign contributions, suddenly everything's OK with earmarks.

As Mark Twain put it, "90% of our politicians give the other 10% a bad name."

So what do we taxpayers do about it?  We can complain, but that won't get us anywhere.  Big shots bribe the Ways and Means Committee to write tax loopholes for them, they get representation without taxation, we get taxation without representation.  Complaining won't do us any good, but we can vote NO.

The only thing that gets a Congresscritter's attention is losing an election.  What if everybody on the web decided to vote against incumbents?  They're all crooked bums, we need a whole new set.  Whoever your incumbent is, just vote NO.  It doesn't matter whether you agree with him or not, they're all crooks, vote 'em out!

It's real simple, pass it on: this election, whoever's in office, just vote NO.  If we get rid of all the incumbents, maybe the new guys will take us seriously.  If we don't punish them for stealing our money, we have nobody to blame but ourselves.

Hobbes is a staff writer for Scragged.com.  Read other Scragged.com articles on 2008 election, voting, Nancy Pelosi and earmark
Share this article:   |    (What is this?)

Reader Comments

  • 92mr2 said:
    Wouldn't it be great. They are all in it for themselves. Actually a lot like bankers.
    No bank offer's a service that doesn't benifit the bank first.
    Is there a cure short of an armed insurection.......I'll bet not.

    Cheers
    February 1, 2008 9:04 PM
  • channel6 said:
    "They threw out a law that would make it illegal to send money to businesses that hire lawmaker's relatives"

    What law? Wasn't that just a proposal?
    February 2, 2008 11:37 PM
  • Thomas Moore said:
    It was a proposal which was CERTAINLY consistent with Pelosi's promise to clean up congress. It was rejected out of hand. It was a proposed law which didn't make it. It got thrown out.
    February 3, 2008 7:45 AM
  • Sir David Von Mudkip said:
    Congress is a bunch of crooks. The problem with this proposal is that we'll just throw out one bunch of crooks and replace 'em with another.
    February 4, 2008 2:06 PM
  • Nelson Lee Walker said:
    Sir David,

    I take issue with the fact that ALL the new members of Congress will be crooks. I believe that the more turnover we create in Congress by ALWAYS voting out the incumbents in every election, the more likely we will get more ordinary citizens to run for Congress, even knowing that they will be voted out in the next election.That will mean we have defacto Term Limits for Congress.

    I don't believe the average American is a crook.
    When enough Americans realize that it is only long service that turns Congresspeople into crooks, we will finally get a term limits amendment to allow good Congresspeople to be reelected for more than one term.

    Everybody should checkout http://goooh.com for a new way to clean out Congress.
    February 5, 2008 4:02 PM
  • Fritz_Katz said:
    Since Twain is quoted: "90% of our politicians give the other 10% a bad name." -- why not vote out the 90% that is corrupt?
    February 26, 2008 12:32 PM

Add Your Comment...

Name (required)
Email Address (optional - will not be shown or shared)
Comment

Submit